Gamifying Student Retention: How E.I. Games is Changing the Conversation

Higher education leaders have spent decades wringing their hands about retention. While some institutions still blame “unmotivated” students or a poor high‑school pipeline, research shows that the first year of university is fraught with social, emotional and logistical challenges that often push otherwise capable students out the door. Homesickness, failing a quiz, stress and work‑study conflicts are not trivial speed bumps – they are central to the attrition crisis eigames.com. Addressing these issues requires more than orientation pamphlets and punitive academic policies.

Emotional intelligence isn’t “soft”; it’s strategic

A growing body of evidence shows that emotional intelligence skills – self‑awareness, self‑regulation, social awareness and relationship management – correlate positively with academic engagement, better classroom behaviour and higher grades.

In other words, students who can navigate disappointment, ask for help and manage anxiety are far more likely to stay and succeed. Social‑emotional interventions have been shown to improve academic performance across K‑12 and higher education. Unfortunately, most universities still treat EI as an optional extra rather than a core competency.

Enter E.I. Games: A gamified support system, not a gimmick

E.I. Games’ Student Success Game – sometimes branded as the Phoenix Student Success Game – was built specifically to address the attrition problem. The game presents a series of real‑world scenarios that first‑year students typically face. Players must make emotionally intelligent decisions about issues ranging from homesickness and failing a quiz to time management and changing majors.

Two things make this product stand out:

1. It’s a support system and an early warning tool. Rather than lecturing students, the game connects them with campus advisory services and includes an “early warning” component to flag at‑risk students. That proactive outreach can be a game‑changer for students who might otherwise slip through the cracks.

2. It speaks the students’ language. Testimonials from professors and students say the game’s interactive scenarios foster richer discussions than traditional texts. The gamified format keeps students engaged and forces them to wrestle with practical dilemmas rather than memorising abstract theories.

3. 
   

Does it work? Evidence and caveats

According to developmental research conducted with Ball State University, students who played the Phoenix Student Success Game demonstrated heightened awareness of counselling services and other campus resources, and the reported dropout rate among participants was cut in half. Students said the game better prepared them to handle emotional turmoil during their transition to university life. These are impressive claims for any retention intervention.

Educators who have integrated E.I. Games into their courses echo these findings. A Harvard School of Design instructor praised the game for combining the “human side of business” with engaging simulations, while an Arizona State University lecturer said it sparked animated debates and deeper discussion than conventional materials. Even sceptics agree that the tool succeeds at meeting students where they are – on their phones and laptops – and that alone increases the odds of meaningful engagement.

However, it’s important not to oversell gamification as a silver bullet. E.I. Games’ own marketing positions the product as a support and early‑warning system rather than a standalone solution. The Ball State study was encouraging, but public data on long‑term retention improvements remain limited. The game also relies on institutions to act on its “early warning” signals; without adequate staffing in counselling and student services, those alerts can easily go unheeded.

Looking forward: The future of retention lies in holistic, human‑centred design

The success of E.I. Games underscores a larger point: student retention isn’t just about grade point averages; it’s about equipping young adults with the social and emotional tools to navigate a complex environment. A forward‑thinking institution should therefore:

• Integrate EI training into the core curriculum. Research shows that social‑emotional learning improves academic performance. Gamified tools like the Student Success Game make that training accessible and engaging, but they work best alongside broader EI programmes.

• Use data to drive early intervention. Tools that flag struggling students only matter if universities have robust support systems ready to respond. Gamified assessments can complement analytics from learning management systems to build a fuller picture of each student’s risk profile.

• Remain transparent and critical. Universities must be honest about the strengths and limitations of any retention tool. Gamification can’t replace human mentorship, mental health services or financial aid. It’s a component in a much larger ecosystem.

E.I. Games’ Student Success Game demonstrates how technology and psychology can intersect to tackle a stubborn problem. By focusing on emotional intelligence – often derided as “soft skills” – and packaging it in a format students actually want to use, the company has produced a tool that’s both popular and evidence‑based. When combined with strong institutional support, such games have the potential to transform student retention from an enrolment statistic into a holistic, human‑centred mission.